Faversham, Kent, where the estate is planned to be erected on 320 acres of farmland, has witnessed local backlash against the scheme, citing discrepancies with the King's commitment to environmental and agricultural causes.
Despite the Duchy's assertion that the initiative aligns with the Prince of Wales' vision for sustainable housing and addresses housing shortages in the region, community members have expressed strong opposition during the public consultation phase.
Concerns were raised over the potential overshadowing of the existing town, exacerbated traffic congestion, and environmental impact by the expansive development.
Residents emphasized the irreplaceable loss of productive agricultural land and highlighted contradictions with the royal family's purported environmental ethos.
Criticisms also centered on the lack of infrastructure to support such a vast project in a town like Faversham, known for its small population and rural charm.
The proposed development, akin to the previous Duchy ventures in Poundbury and Nansledan, aims to blend traditional architecture with modern sustainability features.
However, locals fear the encroachment on historical villages and agricultural heritage, with sentiments of betrayal and disregard for community well-being resonating among affected parties.
While the Duchy outlines plans for an eco-friendly neighborhood with amenities tailored to residents' needs, skeptics question the long-term implications on the region's character and viability.
The notion of preserving rural landscapes and cultural heritage clashes with the ambitious urbanization drive proposed by the Duchy, sparking a contentious debate over land use, development priorities, and the balance between progress and preservation.